Chile: a new workers' movement is born
(For the PDF of this article click here)
As required by the law, in
the run up to May Day, a delegation from the Movimiento de los
Pueblos y los Trabajadores (People and Workers’ Movement – MPT)
went the police station to ask permission for a march and a rally
to launch the new left movement.
The police officer in charge
said that permission could not be granted as Arturo Martinez, the
president of the Chilean trade union movement,(TUC) would not be pleased to find a another rally was
going to be organised on May Day. So we decided to join the march
of the TUC, and then have our own rally anyway in Parque
Almagro.
Since that “incident”, there
have been a few more provocations, so proving the truth of Don
Quixote’s remark: “If dogs bark it is a signal that we are
moving forward.” [1]
The new movement refused to
countenance an agreement with either the rightwing opposition or
the Concertación (Socialist and Christian Democrat coalition in
office). The new movement promotes the independence of the working
class from the capitalist state and the bosses’ organisations. The
MPT will be a federal party and an alliance of struggle for social
transformation. The goal is to conquer political power and
establish a classless society, one based upon solidarity, equality,
a vision both libertarian and liberating. The MPT rules out any
electoral support to all the establishment parties that underpin
capitalist domination, and all parties that have electoral
agreements with the Concertación.[2]
Chile is no longer the same
country it was a few years ago. Today, leftist parties and
popular social movements are becoming more confident and prominent
in political life and have opened up great possibilities for
challenging the hegemony of the capitalists and their
state.
The government led by Bachelet applies essentially the same
neoliberal policies as its predecessors, even if embroidered with
some minor, Keynesian measures to mollify some businesses and
workers. Indeed, successive Concertación governments have
consolidated and strengthened neoliberalism. Most of our basic
natural resources and state-owned companies were privatised to
local capitalists or put into the hands of transnational
companies. As a result the government has no levers it can
pull to protect Chileans from the impact of the credit crunch and
subsequent collapse of world trade.
This revival of opposition to
neo-liberalism predates the onset of the credit crunch. After
decades of neoliberal policies in Chile a new political situation
erupted with the “Uprising of the Penguins” in May 2006, when
1,300,000 secondary school students took to the streets and
occupied their schools for more than a month against the neoliberal
education “reforms”. The most important aspect of this struggle, it
is that directly challenged the entire neoliberal programme of this
and previous Chilean governments.
The school students’ movement has been followed since by several workers’ struggles and other social mobilizations. These struggles have fractured the unity of the Concertación, led by President Michelle Bachelet. In the presidential election later this year, there will four presidential candidates, two of whom belong to the Concertación and two others that have left the coalition in recent years.
People are not happy with the
Concertación’s “route map” for the transition from the Pinochet
dictatorship to bourgeois democracy. For example, the present
binominal electoral system excludes from Congress all those forces
that are not part of the two major coalitions which support
the present system. People are demanding an end to this electoral
system and install a democratic, proportional voting electoral
system.
Campaigns are gathering momentum for workers' rights and against
the legal restrictions embedded in the Labour Law, which were
inherited from the dictatorship. These laws were designed by
Piñeira, the brother of the presidential candidate of the right
wing in this year’s elections. It is draconian law that limits the
right to strike, sanctions layoffs and wage cuts, and promote
divisions by weakening and atomising trade union organisations.
Under the impact of the
current crisis ), a trade union based united front –Frente Amplio
de Trabajadores FAT (Broad Front of Workers) – has been formed, in
which Revolucion Proletaria (RP) has participated from day one. One
of its key demands is for the abolition of the current social
security system (Asociacion de Fondons Previsionales - AFP), which
followed the privatisation of the state pension funds by General
Pinochet.
Today, the AFP is in the
hands of powerful, Chilean and foreign economic groups such as
US-based Citibank which charge extremely high commissions to
employees, while employers contribute nothing to workers' social
security. As a result, workers retire with miserly pensions to live
on.
The FAT has drawn in the national trade union leaders and rank and file workers of the two main sectors hit by the economic crisis: construction and the banks. These sectors are also now part of the MPT, and have fully backed the inclusion of transitional demands in the MPT programme, such as the call for the expropriation and nationalisation of the pension schemes, the banks, finance houses; for the sliding scale of wages, an end to commercial secrets, the opening of the accounts of businesses to the scrutiny of employees, a sliding scale of hours, and the creation of public works under the control of the workers.
In mid-May, thousands of
university and secondary school students took to the streets
demanding an end to the present education system, which has
weakened and damaged the provision of free, public education, by
permanently cutting-back resources and favouring the proliferation
of private companies which profit from education. This privatised
system naturally has become a fundamental element in the
reproduction of the neoliberal ideology and laws. Also, on 18 May,
a national strike of the Teachers Union members in primary and
secondary schools got underway, demanding the payment of the
bonuses agreed in previous negotiations with the municipalities.
What kind of movement is the
MPT?
The MPT is both a product of
these struggles and channels them into something new. The MPT
includes human rights’ organisations
that are still struggling to uncover the complete truth about past
human rights violations and get justice for the victims of those in
power. It includes the Mapuche people and other ethnic groups who
demand full recognition of the rights of native peoples. It
includes environmental groups, fighting for the defence and respect
of the biodiversity and against climate change. It includes urban
groups fighting against repossession of their homes by banks that
have inflicted punitive interest rates upon them.[3] All
of these ongoing struggles and their leaders are to be found in the
ranks of the MPT.
For this reason the
emergence of the MPT is an extremely positive development. It
represents an opportunity to mobilize workers and social
organizations under a united and principled banner against the
capitalist crisis. Moreover, the
alliance is both broader and more solid than has prevailed in the
past.
Yet this step forward
generates its own problems. The organizations within the MPT come
from different political traditions. Among them are three Trotsky’s
groups – the Izquierda Comunista (official section of the Morenoite
Fourth International), the Partido Revolucionario de los
Trabajadores (sympathising section of the Morenoites), RP – as well
as other groups that sympathise with Trotskyism but have no
finished, rounded political profile.
Also, there are anarchist
collectives, the Movimiento Popular Manuel Rodriguez, which used to
be the armed wing of the Communist Party but are now undertaking a
serious examination of Trotsky’s Marxism. Among other sectors of
the MPT are fragments of the Communist Party, ecologist groups,
Marxist student collectives, tenant associations, trade unions, and
gay and lesbian groups.
While the MPT is a
movement that fights for the revolutionary transformation of
society, it is not a mass, revolutionary combat party with a clear
scientific programme. But it is a step towards it. The MPT’s
intervention in the class struggle is helping to shape it and tests
its demands and programme. The MPT is different in important ways
to experiments in Europe, like Respect in Britain or the NPA in
France. For start, there is no
caudillo like George Galloway whose idiosyncratic
and even reactionary positions have to be accommodated and who is
not subject to any accountability . Nor there is a dominant
centrist group like the Socialist Workers Party (in the UK) which
effectively pulls the strings of the larger formation. Nor have
Trotskyist currents dissolved themselves inside the MPT, like the
LCR has done in France.
Of course, different
problems exist in the MPT. For example, groups with a guerrillaist
past may have broken with foquismo but they still
have residues of the “Popular Power” strategy in their makeup, or
others retain petit-bourgeois methods in the fight against the
effects of climate change. And of course, the centrist groups
within the Trotskyist tradition have different methods and
programmes.
Yet the MPT is proving
attractive to a diverse set of people, groups, campaigns, and trade
unions, and those who are unhappy with the Concertación and the
establishment parties. Groups of young members of the Communist
Party, for example, have abandoned their organisation due its
obsession with remaining part the Concertación at all costs.
Another example: before May Day, and RP activist in the Federation
of Bank Workers intervened in a conference of the union and as a
result of his appeal all 68 delegates agreed to march under the
banner of the MPT.
Also that day, various
leftwing student collectives held meetings with the students of the
Trotskyist groups and subsequently agreed to call for the formation
of a youth movement of the MPT and to begin an energetic campaign
of recruitment and political education. [4]
The aims of Revolución
Proletaria
Revolución Proletaria is
committed to working inside the
MPT in a constructive and non-sectarian way. But, one
historical lesson that we seek to bring to bear is the need to
build a “vanguard party”. Why is this essential? In the first place
because the working class is politically and socially
heterogeneous; the working class includes men and women, young and
old, employed and unemployed, trade-unionists and unorganized,
immigrant and native-born, native majorities and ethnic
minorities.
Those engaged in feminist struggles, student and youth struggles,
Mapuche rights’ struggles, those who fight against mortgage debts
and home repossessions, and so forth, tend to see only one, albeit
vital, part of the larger picture of the struggle against
capitalism and its state. It is not enough for everyone to engage
in their separate activities, even simultaneously. It is necessary
to have an organization, a vanguard party, that centralizes the
knowledge and experience of all these struggles.
A vanguard party is made necessary not only by the heterogeneity of
the working class but also by the unevenness of class activity and
class consciousness among workers. The working class engages in
spontaneous self-activity, fighting the capitalists for better
conditions, but this struggle has its upsurges and periods of
quiescence, as victories raise morale and fighting spirit and
defeats bring a need for recuperation. The members of a vanguard
party, however, are committed socialists devoted to political
activity at all times.
The sense of acting as a class, moreover, does not automatically
lead to a realization of the need for doing away with capitalist
society. A vanguard party welds the most class conscious elements
into a party that sets its goal the destruction of the capitalist
state which underpins and oversees exploitation and
oppression.[5]
The party combines in its activity agitation, organization, and
education in a manner appropriate to particular times and
circumstances. It integrates socialist education with its
participation in the struggles of the day, showing the relationship
between the socialist goal and the day-to-day
events.
An organization becomes a
vanguard party only when it becomes recognized as such by the
advanced sections of those engaged in struggle. Only when militants
in the trade unions, leaders of strikes, and organizers of
demonstrations and mass struggles enter a socialist party or follow
it in action, does a party become a vanguard party. Until then it
is only possible to lay claim to being a nucleus of a vanguard
party, one that seeks to become a genuine vanguard party. It aims
to teach the masses to develop their self-activity and to broaden
their struggle. Such struggle not only serves to beat back
capitalist offensives and preserve and extend working-class gains
but trains workers for the eventual taking of state
power.
For all
these political reasons, Revolucion Proletaria could never agree to
dissolving itself. We enter the MPT as Revolucion Proletaria; our
organisational ties remain the same, our papers, journals and
leaflets continue to appear as usual. At the same time we are
strongly committed to building the
MPT as our central project.[6] RP exists
both as a component of the MPT
and as a public, independent organisation, with its own programme,
political line and publications, but which conducts as much of its
political work as possible through
it.
The MPT is the most important
initiative towards building a broad, revolutionary party in Chile
we have seen since the fall of Pinochet. It is the only
organisation on the far left with significant roots in the trade
unions and embraces a significant number of young and enthusiastic
people. The MPT is a new organisation and its long-term existence
has not yet been secured. Its major tests are in the future. A long
process of testing its programme and demands in the class struggle
lies ahead as does a democratic process of political discussion,
forging agreements and arriving at programmatic homogenization.
[7]
The current capitalist crisis
is undermining the foundations of the reformist consensus. Cracks
are appearing everywhere in the hegemony of the Concertación, which
is leading sectors of social movements to look for more radical and
lasting solutions to their problems. Helping to turn the MPT
into a clear anticapitalist and socialist revolutionary project is
the most important contribution Revolucion Proletaria can make
today in Chile.
[1] In addition to the May Day march and launch rally in the
capital there were smaller marches and rallies in the cities of La
Serena, Valparaiso, Concepcion and Valdivia. Individual members and
small groups of MPT supporters are found in many other towns as
well.
[2] This applies to the Communist and Humanist parties that are
in negotiations with the Concertacion.
[3] See PR website article….
[4] This coming Saturday will be an aggregate of the FAT, where
RP has contribute with a document to develop the trade union work
and to organise new unions where are needed and to build a class
current inside the trade unions and the TUC. Also, yesterday was
agreed to develop its artistic,
poetry, theatre and cultural activities, so the MPT can develop its own political line
along its own mysticism and culture, as part of a new political
organisation base on fraternal comradeship and frank and open
political discussions and polemics, method that were denied or
twisted by the Stalinist and socialist party bosses. These are just
a few examples of enthusiastic initiatives, at the moment the
creativity it limited only by the lack of material resources, that
we hope we shall overcome as well, at least partially. But still,
we have to recognize that there political issues we cannot ignore,
and it will take some time to be resolved.
[5] The same is true on an international scale, necessitating an
international organization built along the same
lines.
[6] At public events, demonstrations, solidarity action with
workers in struggle, strikes, etc, led by the MPT, we give a high
priority to the profile of MPT.
[7] A programmatic conference of the MPT in June will debate what
kind of socialism we envisage given the deep discredit of
Stalinism.
Tue 11, August 2009 @ 13:14
Bookmark with:
What are these?